Legal Opinion
Wray v. Schwitzer Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 1981No. 12001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TITUS, Judge.
Employee Mildred R. Wray filed for benefits under the workmen’s compensation law. Ch. 287, V.A.M.S. In all involved proceedings, the principal issue in dispute concerned the nature and extent of employee’s permanent partial disability. The only medical evidence adduced relative to disability was via written reports submitted by various treating and examining physicians. Through its chief administrative law judge, the Division of Workmen’s Compensation (division) awarded Mrs. Wray compensation based on 15% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. Upon review, the Labor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thacker v. Massman Const. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Denton Construction Co. v. Missouri State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Brooks v. General Motors Assembly DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Blair v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fogelsong v. Banquet Foods CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Blissenbach v. General Motors Assembly DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lineberry v. ShullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Alexander v. Pin Oaks Nursing HomeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. MossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.