Kirby Planing Mill Co. v. Titus
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Garnishment;' from city court of Thomasville — Judge W. M, Hammond. June 19, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.
The questions presented for decision in the present case arose upon the trial of a traverse to an answer of a garnishee. The evidence adduced upon the trial was substantially as follows: Titus had obtained a judgment against the Tallahassee Saw Mill Company for $1,500, and on July 23, 1912, caused summons -of garnishment to be served upon the Kirby Planing Mill Company. The garnishee admitted that it was indebted to the principal defendant in the sum of $248.11, but claimed that the debt could not be reached by garnishment process, for the following reasons: The Tallahassee Saw Mill Company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. Mutual Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Reviere v. ChamblissSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Watt-Harley-Holmes Hardware Co. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Parker-Fain Grocery Co. v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Butler, Stevens & Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hiatt v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- McIntire v. RaskinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Moore v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Breathitt County Board of Education v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Savannah River Sales Co. v. FindleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920