Legal Opinion

Barney v. May

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1917No. Nos. 20,024—(171)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From a decree of the probate court for Hennepin county, Dahl, J., assigning the residue of the estate of Lydia Ann May, deceased, Cora L. Barney, as heir at law of decedent, appealed to the district court for that county. The appeal was heard before Steele, J., who amended the decree of the probate court so that the personal property assigned to Fred M. May was assigned to Fred M. May and Cora L. Barney, share and share alike.

Read the full summary

From a decree of the probate court for Hennepin county, Dahl, J., assigning the residue of the estate of Lydia Ann May, deceased, Cora L. Barney, as heir at law of decedent, appealed to the district court for that county. The appeal was heard before Steele, J., who amended the decree of the probate court so that the personal property assigned to Fred M. May was assigned to Fred M. May and Cora L. Barney, share and share alike. From the judgment entered pursuant to the findings, Fred M. May appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

1. Lydia Ann May made a will, April 18, 1912. At that time she was the owner of some pieces of real estate, the most valuable of which was a *301building known as the Oxford Flats, an apartment building in Minneapolis. The building constituted the bulk of her property. She had beside, some furniture, plate, jewelry, chinaware, pictures, books and household belongings, and a horse, wagon, cutter and harness of small value. She had only a nominal amount of money or other property. Plaintiff and defendant were her only children and heirs at law. She was fond of both. In her will she made bequests…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Estate of LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. In re Swenson's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Adams v. AkerlundIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gallagher v. McKeagueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re the Trusteeship under the Last Will & Testament of BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Estate of KlewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Estate of SorensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. In re the Estate of StiemesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. Schuster v. SchusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API