Legal Opinion

Dehart v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1997No. 96-546PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Scarlett DeHart sued Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., alleging that Blair O’Neal, a Wal-Mart pharmacist, negligently reported to police officials that Ms. DeHart might be attempting to obtain a controlled substance by using a fraudulently obtained prescription. Wal-Mart’s motion for summary judgment was granted, and Ms. DeHart has appealed on the ground that there are remaining genuine issues of fact. Ark. R. Civ. P. 56(c). She also contends the judgment was issued prematurely because discovery had not been completed. We dismiss the latter point because it was not raised before…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keck v. American Employment Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Young v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Anthony v. KaplanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Smith v. Sneed, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. FarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. D.B. Griffin Warehouse, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Mans v. Peoples Bank of ImbodenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Sawada v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Patrick v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API