Pearson v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Annie Pearson appeals from the trial court's order dismissing, on the basis of a statute-of-limitations defense, her complaint against Glenn Brooks and Michael Black seeking damages for a job-related injury. We affirm.
Pearson was employed initially in the quality assurance and inspection department at Perdue Farms, Inc., a company operating a chicken-processing plant in Dothan. Subsequently, Pearson was transferred to the sanitation department; Brooks was the superintendent of the sanitation department, and Black was Pearson's immediate supervisor. Pearson was responsible for cleaning the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Fulmer v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Jones v. Resorcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Marsh v. WenzelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Crowl v. Kayo Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ex Parte Chemical Lime of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Ex Parte Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Ex Parte BowmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Pompey v. LumpkinDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- Ex Parte Hampton Insurance Agency, 1101211 (Ala. 11-18-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.