Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 5, 2003No. 1021494PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annie Pearson appeals from the trial court's order dismissing, on the basis of a statute-of-limitations defense, her complaint against Glenn Brooks and Michael Black seeking damages for a job-related injury. We affirm.

Pearson was employed initially in the quality assurance and inspection department at Perdue Farms, Inc., a company operating a chicken-processing plant in Dothan. Subsequently, Pearson was transferred to the sanitation department; Brooks was the superintendent of the sanitation department, and Black was Pearson's immediate supervisor. Pearson was responsible for cleaning the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Fulmer v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Jones v. Resorcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Marsh v. WenzelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Crowl v. Kayo Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Chemical Lime of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Ex Parte BowmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Pompey v. LumpkinDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
  5. Ex Parte Hampton Insurance Agency, 1101211 (Ala. 11-18-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API