Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bowman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 7, 2007No. 1061079PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phil Bowman petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to dismiss Clarence Heard's and Janice Heard's claims against him. At the outset, we note that this is a companion case to Ex parte Atkinson,976 So.2d 1001 (Ala. 2007).

Facts and Procedural History

The pertinent facts in this case, as set forth in Ex parteAtkinson, are as follows:

"Clarence Heard claims he was injured on November 23, 2002, in an accident involving a positive flow continuous fermenter manufactured by APV North America, Inc. (`the APV tank'), while he was employed by Ventura Foods, L.L.C. On November…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Ex Parte Inverness Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte SnowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Fulmer v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ex Parte TidmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weber v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Ex Parte GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Dulin v. Northeast Alabama Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  4. Crabtree v. BASF Building Systems, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ala. Dep't of Transp. v. TK & S Trucking, LLC (In re Am. Sweeping, Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API