Legal Opinion

Bast v. County of Clinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Plumadore, J.), entered May 10, 1990 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Among the factors to be considered in deciding an application to serve a late notice of claim are whether the public corporation had actual knowledge of the claim and the infancy of the party making the motion (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]). Not only was the delay here unrelated to petitioner’s infancy, as counsel was retained within 90 days of the incident (see,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Albanese v. Village of Floral ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Sampson v. CazzariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Groshans v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Howard v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. Madrid-Waddington Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Bast v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API