Legal Opinion
Ridley v. M & T Bank (In re Ridley)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 31, 2017No. CASE NO. 11-81817-TRC, CASE NO. 16-8008-TRCPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TOM R. CORNISH, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Plaintiff Charles D. Ridley seeks an order from this Court finding that Defendant M & T Bank violated the automatic stay and discharge injunction. After conducting a trial in this matter, the Court finds that Defendant M & T Bank did violate the discharge injunction and should therefore be found in contempt of court. The Court also awards damages including lost wages, punitive damages and attorney fees to Rid-ley.
*356Jurisdiction
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a) and 1334(b). This is a core…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Diviney v. Nationsbank of Texas (In Re Diviney)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Paul v. IglehartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Johnson v. Smith (In Re Johnson)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Santander Consumer, USA, Inc. v. Houlik (In re Houlik)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re FontaineUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Sprague v. John Williams, Ellen B. Williams(In re Van Winkle)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Cawood v. Seterus, Inc. (In re Cawood)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- (BK) In Re Melanio Lolarga Valdellon, IIIDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Alarid, Jr. v. PachecoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.