Legal Opinion

In re Londos

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1918No. 4,177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

(In Chambers.) Original application of William Londos for a writ of habeas corpus. Writ quashed and complainant remanded to custody.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

On December 1, 1917, William Londos pleaded guilty to a charge of gambling, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a term of thirty days, and to pay a fine of $250. The judgment provides that if the fine be not paid, the defendant shall stand committed for a term equal to one day for every $2 of the fine after the expiration of the thirty days’ imprisonment. The prisoner having served his term of thirty days applies for his release from custody upon the theory that our statutes do not authorize the imposition of imprisonment to satisfy the fine in any case where the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex parte RosenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fisher v. McDanielWyoming Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Berkenfield v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People ex rel. Gately v. SageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foertsch v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. SorensonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. In re ConverseNevada Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Spinler v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re Application of MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API