Legal Opinion
Egan v. Hammond
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1972No. 1711PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION IN RE OBJECTIONS TO INTERIM REAPPORTIONMENT PLAN
Before BONEY, C. J., and RABINO-WITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BOOCH-EVER, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Justice.
In our Decision and Order of May 26, 1972,1 this court declared the reapportionment plan embodied in the December 30, 1971, Proclamation of Reapportionment and Redistricting unconstitutional under the equal protection and supremacy clauses of the Constitution of the United States of America. We reached this conclusion for the reason that the proposed plan in its overall reapportionment of the Senate and House of Representatives would have…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Davis v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
3Cited by33 opinions
- Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. HammondAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.