Legal Opinion
Martin v. Fairchild Aviation Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1938No. 8510PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
This motion presents objections to 83 interrogatories attached to a bill of discovery in aid of an action at law to recover treble damages for the alleged infringement of five patents having to do with airplane equipment. The answer in the main suit raises issues of validity and infringement.
The interrogatories have been classified in the defendants’ brief in five groups, and that classification seems to be proper and convenient.
Group I. Numbers 1, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 22, 26, 31, and 34.
The first is typical and asks if the defendants or any of them, “their predecessor,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowers v. Atlantic, G. & P. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Paraffine Cos., Inc. v. WielandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1927
- Colgate & Co. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1928
- Edison v. Allis Chalmers Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Otto v. Koppers Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1955