Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ah Sam v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 19, 1982No. 352-79CPublished

1DissentKashiwa, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision.

The basic issue herein is whether the cost of living allowance (COLA) paid to federal workers in Hawaii must be considered as a "rate of basic pay” for purposes of other adjustments to General Schedule (GS) pay allowed by 5 U.S.C. § 5334(a) or 5 U.S.C. § 5333(b). Under 5 U.S.C. § 5334(a), an employee transferred to the GS pay system from the prevailing rate wage system (WS) may have his initial GS salary adjusted upwards if his "rate of basic pay” would not otherwise exceed his former WS wages. Under 5 U.S.C. § 5333(b), a GS supervisor’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Joseph E. Curlott, and Cross-Appellants v. Alan Campbell, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Kalv v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Curlott v. HamptonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API