Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jason Bokori v. Jasmina Martinoski

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 45A03-1603-SC-519Published

1DissentBarteau, Senior Judge

The majority concludes that appellate review and disposition of this case hinges on the sufficiency of the evidence of fair market value, and would dispose of this case as an impermissible request by Jason Bokori to reweigh that evidence. I believe that the trial court did not appropriately apply the law, committing clear error, and, therefore, I must respectfully dissent.

Financial choices made by individuals often lead to outcomes that seem unfair or inequitable. When that happens, it is natural to seek recourse against those perceived to be at the source of the unfairness or inequity. I am…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campins v. CapelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Harris v. PetersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. v. Indiana InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Ridenour v. FurnessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Dado v. JeeningaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API