Legal Opinion

Buskey v. Town of Hanover

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 9, 1990No. 88-465PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant, the Town of Hanover, appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Morrill, J.) that the defendant’s residential zoning ordinance is unconstitutional as applied to a certain parcel of land owned by the plaintiffs, Stephen and Raymond Buskey. We hold that the residential zoning ordinance is not arbitrary or unreasonable as applied to the plaintiffs’ subject property. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order.

The plaintiffs own a 7,980-square-foot parcel of land located at 8 School Street in Hanover, which is at the southeast corner of the intersection of Allen Street,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. Metzger v. Town of BrentwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. Wesemann v. Village of La Grange ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Community Resources for Justice, Inc. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. Quirk v. Town of New BostonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Morgenstern v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. Smith v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Dow v. Town of EffinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API