Legal Opinion

H & EN, Inc. v. Oklahoma Department of Labor

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 2006No. 103,126PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant, H & EN, Inc. (Employer), appeals from the trial court’s order granting Appellee, Oklahoma Department of Labor’s (Department), Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. 1 We hold the trial court properly granted Department’s motion to dismiss because Employer failed to include its wage claimant employee as a party to the action. We affirm.

¶ 2 The record reflects that Virginia R. Milner (Employee), filed a Wage Claim with Department seeking wages she alleged were due and unpaid by Employer. Employer denied that Employee was in its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edmondson v. Siegfried Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Transwestern Publishing, L.L.C. v. LangdonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Klopfenstein v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality v. Department of Central ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Marriage of Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. ALEXANDER v. ALEXANDERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. Choices Institute v. Oklahoma Health Care AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API