Legal Opinion
Cruz v. Ansul Chemical Company
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 10, 1966No. 146PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Chief Justice.
Special exceptions filed separately by each of the two defendants to plaintiff’s original petition were sustained by the trial court, and plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff refused to amend, and the suit was ordered dismissed. From such order, plaintiff has appealed to this court.
Plaintiff alleged in his petition that on or about July 20, 1963, he purchased from defendant Murray, doing business as Murray Boat Works, in McAllen, Texas, hereinafter referred to as Murray, a fire extinguisher manufactured by defendant An-sul Chemical Company, a Wisconsin…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Race v. . KrumNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hindman v. Texas Lime CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Southern Underwriters v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lanphier Construction Co. v. Fowco Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- O. M. Franklin Serum Co. v. C. A. Hoover & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Monsanto Company v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Pontarelli Trust Ex Rel. Pontarelli v. City of McAllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.