Legal Opinion

Schwarz v. Lee Gon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge. Action by Moritz Schwarz and others, partners, against Lee Gon and another, in which defendants had a judgment, from which plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is an action to recover possession of 86 bales of hops. The defendants had a verdict and judgment in the court below, and the plaintiffs appeal, assigning as error the overruling of their challenge for cause to the juror Graber, the admission of testimony, in the giving and refusal of certain instructions.

1. The juror Graber testified, in substance, on his voir dire, that he did not know either of the parties to the litigation, knew nothing about the case, and had no opinion as to the merits; that he did not know where his sympathies would be as between a hop merchant and a farmer; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Guille v. Wong FookOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Phipps v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Sharp v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Halsey v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bemis v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McDonald v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Benjamin Schwarz & Sons v. KennedyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API