Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1941No. Appeals, 161-164PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

These appeals are from the adjudication of several accounts of trustees acting under agreements providing support for a wife and three children. Separation proceedings instituted by FitzGerald and his wife, now the Princess Lida, culminating in an absolute divorce, resulted in two trust agreements: the first, made in 1906, providing for the accumulation of a sum exceeding $300,000, designated as the Children’s Trust Fund; the second, made in 1915, providing for a fund exceeding $400,000, referred to as the Alimony Trust Fund. Details of these agreements, which need…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Thompson v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. King v. York Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Johnson v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Gill's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. F. E. McGillick Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. Estate of Marshall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  3. In Re Harader TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Biggins v. ShoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Biggins v. ShoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API