Gill's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Testator devised his estate in trust for a son and daughter, “for their maintenance and education,” directing that the trustees named by him, — a trust company and certain individuals, — should invest the fund so that it would “bear sufficient interest” to pay for such “education and maintenance.” He further particularly directed that the trustees should “not deliver over any of the principal......until such time as [they] in their judgment deem[ed] it wise and prudent to deliver over the same,” and that, “when in the best judgment of [such trustees] they deem[ed] it wise and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spring's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Smith's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kenna EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Bowers' Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Curry AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Thompson v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.