Legal Opinion

Gill's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1928No. Appeal, 63PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Testator devised his estate in trust for a son and daughter, “for their maintenance and education,” directing that the trustees named by him, — a trust company and certain individuals, — should invest the fund so that it would “bear sufficient interest” to pay for such “education and maintenance.” He further particularly directed that the trustees should “not deliver over any of the principal......until such time as [they] in their judgment deem[ed] it wise and prudent to deliver over the same,” and that, “when in the best judgment of [such trustees] they deem[ed] it wise and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spring's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Smith's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kenna EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Bowers' Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Curry AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Thompson v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API