Legal Opinion

Locke v. Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

(after stating the facts). Locke was charged with a violation of ordinance 1203 of the city of Fort Smith. Section one of the ordinance reads as follows : ‘ ‘ That it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation or association in any manner to transport into the city, or from one place to another place in the city, or for any railroad company, or express company or other common carrier, or any officer, ag’ent or employee of any of them, or any other person, to ship or transport into, or deliver in the city in any manner, or by any means whatsoever, any alcoholic, vinous, malt,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hager v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DabneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Fly v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Wilson v. BatesvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API