Legal Opinion

Himel v. Fellman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1931No. 13,327PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

■ Plaintiff seeks the’ return of a deposit-of $1,500 made with ¡.defendant, ;-a.:real estate’ .agent; in connection !with-..' an' "of-fen/ made,:, by. plaintiff through the - said iagent to.’ purchase for the ■ sum--,.of $15,000i-''certain .real ': estate on . the Gulf cdast’/in -iMississippi.” . • . ,

/ The petition, .//vithoút so alleging, treats the said offer’ (to’ purchase, as an’absolute nullity, makes no mention whatever of the pthey. party to/the - contract to ’ purchase the" real estate,.. to;.wit: the prospective vendor and, after charging that the said ugreemént-■ is-. ’not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maloney v. AschaffenburgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Hunley v. AscaniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Bussey v. Wise-MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Villemeur v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gauss v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Richardson v. Charles Kirsch & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  3. Francis v. BlacheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Martin v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Schroeder v. MorrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API