Himel v. Fellman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.
■ Plaintiff seeks the’ return of a deposit-of $1,500 made with ¡.defendant, ;-a.:real estate’ .agent; in connection !with-..' an' "of-fen/ made,:, by. plaintiff through the - said iagent to.’ purchase for the ■ sum--,.of $15,000i-''certain .real ': estate on . the Gulf cdast’/in -iMississippi.” . • . ,
/ The petition, .//vithoút so alleging, treats the said offer’ (to’ purchase, as an’absolute nullity, makes no mention whatever of the pthey. party to/the - contract to ’ purchase the" real estate,.. to;.wit: the prospective vendor and, after charging that the said ugreemént-■ is-. ’not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maloney v. AschaffenburgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Hunley v. AscaniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bussey v. Wise-MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Villemeur v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gauss v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Richardson v. Charles Kirsch & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Francis v. BlacheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- Martin v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Schroeder v. MorrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.