John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. Cohen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The action is to recover the purchase price of large quantities of milk alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendants between March 15 and April 1, 1936. In addition to denials, the defendants’ amended answer sets forth as a first defense that the plaintiff at the time of the transactions in question was a milk dealer, as defined by the Agriculture and Markets Law, and was not licensed to buy or to sell milk within the State of New York. It is accordingly alleged that there can be no recovery of the *229purchase price of the milk sold by the plaintiff to the defendants-because these…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- People v. NebbiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Johnston v. . DahlgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Griffith v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Felice v. St. Agnes HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Best v. Arthur Murray Town & Country Dance ClubCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969
- Bovino v. BerberianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Association of Plumbing & Heating Contractors of Greater New York, Inc. v. MertenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1940
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.