Legal Opinion
Best v. Arthur Murray Town & Country Dance Club
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 17, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarry W. Davis, J.
This action is one of five actions involving the same basic issues herein.
In this action, the plaintiff signed a contract with defendants dated June 3,1968 for 200 hours of dancing lessons at a price of $5,000. She paid the $5,000 in advance.
In Teague v. Fifth Avenue Bernat (Index No. 24156/69) the plaintiff signed a contract dated October 24, 1968 for $7,122.34 for 285 hours of dancing lessons, of which 49% hours in lessons were already used. Plaintiff is suing for $6,423.34, the balance of the unused dance lessons.
In Bardewyck v. Fifth Avenue Bernat (Index No. 29408/69) the plaintiff made…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Porter v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Great Expectations Creative Management, Inc. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Lott v. PatrickNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Pescatori v. Nassau Dance Studio Inc.New York District Court · 1969
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1982