Legal Opinion
Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 3, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-194-JRRPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, District Judge.
This is an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(d). Defendant has moved to withdraw reference of this adversary proceeding from the bankruptcy court. For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that the defendant has not shown sufficient “cause” to merit withdrawal in this case. Alternatively, defendant’s motion is premature, because the bankruptcy court has not yet determined whether this is a “core” or a “non-core” proceeding. Defendant’s motion will be denied.
FACTS
On October 26, 1987 Hatzel & Buehler,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Holland America Insurance Company v. Succession of Shepherd J. Roy, the Union Bank and Central Pecan Shelling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Acolyte Electric Corp. v. City of New YorkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- In Re Edward S. PRUITT and Ida B. Pruitt. Appeal of LANDMARK SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Mellon v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co. (In Re Delaware & HudSon Railway Co.)District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- NDEP Corp. v. Handl-It, Inc. (In Re NDEP Corp.)District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- In Re Parklane/atlanta Joint Venture, Debtor. Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc. v. Parklane/atlanta Venture, James D. SilversCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- In Re Sevko, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.