Legal Opinion

Russell & Axon v. Handshoe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 1, 1965No. G-6PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

176 So.2d 909 (1965)

RUSSELL & AXON, Consultant Engineers, a corporation, Appellant,

v.

Joseph C. HANDSHOE, Appellee.

No. G-6.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 1, 1965.

Rehearing Denied July 19, 1965.

Melvin Orfinger and Charles Tindell, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Norton Josephson, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant, who was defendant in the trial court, has appealed a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding damages to appellee in the sum of $4,800.00. It is appellant's contention that there is no competent substantial evidence in the record…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Paddock v. Bay Concrete Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Goddard v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Bell v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Geoghegan Sons & Co. v. Arbuckle Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Knudsen v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Muller v. Stromberg Carlson Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Singh v. Cities Service Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Benoir v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Garza v. United Child Care, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API