People v. Privett
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDogling, J.
— Defendant Privett and defendant Walker, mother and daughter, were convicted by a jury respectively of burglary and receiving stolen property. They argue on appeal that the trial court erred in admitting over their objection evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search of their - home. The officers entered the home and made the search without a warrant, thus putting the burden on the prosecution to produce evidence sufficient to justify the entry and search. (Badillo v. Superior Court, 46 Cal.2d 269. 272 [294 P.2d 23].)
In the evening of September 13, 1958, an apartment occupied by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. TalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. FeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. GoveaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.