Legal Opinion

People v. Privett

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1961No. Crim. 6720PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDogling, J.

— Defendant Privett and defendant Walker, mother and daughter, were convicted by a jury respectively of burglary and receiving stolen property. They argue on appeal that the trial court erred in admitting over their objection evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search of their - home. The officers entered the home and made the search without a warrant, thus putting the burden on the prosecution to produce evidence sufficient to justify the entry and search. (Badillo v. Superior Court, 46 Cal.2d 269. 272 [294 P.2d 23].)

In the evening of September 13, 1958, an apartment occupied by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. TalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. FeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. GoveaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API