Legal Opinion
Schooner Harbor Ventures, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 16, 2009No. 2008-5084PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns the issue of whether the property of the plaintiff, Schooner Harbor Ventures, Inc. (“Schooner Harbor”), was taken by the United States, such that it must pay just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. The United States Court of Federal Claims (“trial court”) granted summary judgment for the Government on the ground that Schooner Harbor had failed to identify a cognizable property interest that had been affected by government action. Because we find that Schooner Harbor did identify a cognizable property interest, namely fee title to land that could…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mildenberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Reoforce, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.