Legal Opinion

Pitzer v. City of Abilene

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1959No. 3462PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINGS, Justice.

Ernest T. Pitzer and 58 others, as plaintiffs, brought this suit against the City of Abilene. Plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment declaring their rights under a written contract made by their representatives with the City of Abilene in December of 1956 under which the city agreed not to annex territory adjacent to the city designated as East Abilene, for a period of five years after completion of certain water and sewer lines. Plaintiffs also sought judgment declaring void an ordinance passed by the City of Abilene on December 23, 1957, annexing East Abilene in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of San Angelo v. DeutschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Houston v. State Ex Rel West University PlaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Beyer v. Templeton, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State of Texas Ex Rel George v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. City of Dallas v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Little-Tex Insulation Co. v. General Services Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  2. City of Irving v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. City of Crystal City v. Crystal City Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Town of Lovell v. MenhallWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Save Our Aquifer v. City of San AntonioDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API