Legal Opinion
De Villiers v. Utah County
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided October 5, 1994No. 920765-CA and 930274-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
Plaintiff Margot de Villiers appeals from summary judgments entered separately in favor of defendants Highland City and Utah County, claiming that the trial court erred in ruling that Highland City was immune from suit under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act (the Act),1 and that Utah County had no duty to erect a warning sign on 6000 West. We affirm.
FACTS
In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom are viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Higgins v. Salt Lake County, 855 P.2d 231, 233 (Utah 1993).…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Rollins v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Ledfors v. Emery County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gadd by and Through Gadd v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1997
- Bullock v. State, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- De Villiers v. Utah CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994