Legal Opinion

Walker v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1849PublishedCited by 12 opinions

from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans, Strawbridge., J. contended that the act of 1848 does not revive or amend that óf 1847 ; but provides’ Tor the appointment of an officer ! after the term ’of office under the first act had expired. The stat. of 1848’is within the concluding clause of’art. 1’20 of the constitution. Larue, forthé defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

The' judgment of the court (King, J. absent,) was pronounced by !

Eustis', C. J.

This suit was originally instituted by Alexander. Walker, liquidator of the Atchafalaya Railroad and Banking Company, against the defendant, who was a stockholder of said company, ,to recover the sum of $SOOj being the amount of certain instalments which, it was alleged,, was due by the defendant on his stock. The office of liquidator having expired under the law of 1847, M. ,M. Reynolds was appointed to succeed Walker, under the act.of 1848, amending that of 1847, and, having resigned the office pending this suit,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chase v. RogersNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  2. State ex rel. Maguire v. DraperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Tuskaloosa Bridge Co. v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  4. Henderson v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Udell v. Citizens Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API