Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1999No. 990070PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Letitia Brown appeals from the order of the South Central Judicial District Court 'denying her motion for a new trial, or in the alternative, for relief from judgment. She asserts the district court erred in its award of custody of the parties’ son to Michael Brown, its distribution of marital property, and its denial of her post-trial motions and request for stay. Because the district court’s custody award and marital property distribution were not clearly erroneous, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Letitia and Michael Brown were married in 1992 in Bismarck. One child was born to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fox v. FoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Riehl v. RiehlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Zuger v. ZugerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Stoppler v. StopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Schiff v. SchiffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API