United States v. Amiel
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendants Kathryn Amiel, Joanne Amiel and Sarina Amiel move this Court for an Order dismissing the Superseding Indictment against them on the ground that their convictions thereunder constitute a second criminal punishment in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby denies the defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
In a Superseding Indictment, dated March 2, 1992, the Government charged Kathryn, Joanne and Sarina Amiel 1 with thirty (30) Counts of Postal and Interstate Wire Fraud, as well…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Kemi IdowuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996