Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From an order of the supervisors of towns of Martinsburg and Wellington laying out a highway, John Hurst appealed to the district court for Renville county. In the district court the appeal was heard before Powers, J., who found in favor of appellant. From a judgment reversing the order of the supervisors respondent towns appealed to the supreme court.
1DissentCollins, J.
I cannot agree with my associates in the proposition that a landowner over whose premises an attempt is being made to lay out a highway cannot object to irregularities in the proceedings, if he appears before the supervisors, and, as to that point in this case, dissent. The exercise of the power of eminent domain — the taking of a man’s property without his consent — is against common right, and all acts which relate to or confer the right are to be strictly construed. This rule has often been laid down in this court. And in these days, when there is a growing belief that public as well as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Damp v. Town of DaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Ruhland v. Supervisors of the Town of Hazel GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Burkleo v. County of WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Town of Lyle v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Pairier v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.