Legal Opinion

Salla v. County of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Moule, J.

The principal question involved on this appeal is whether section 222 of the Labor Law violates the privileges and immunities or commerce clauses of the United States Constitution.

In 1976 the County of Monroe (County) through its Division of Pure Waters (Division) advertised for bids for the construction of a sanitary sewer line within the County. The sewer line project is administered by the County and the Division and funded under the Federal Environmental Protection and Pure Waters Acts. Lisbon Contractors, Inc. (Lisbon), a Pennsylvania corporation, was awarded…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Departments of Transportation & Labor v. Enserch Alaska Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Salla v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Callanan Industries, Inc. v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Susquehanna Development, L. L. C. v. Assessor of the City of BinghamtonNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Augat v. DowlingNew York Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API