Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1969No. 25151PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Franicum, Justice.

1. “The effect of the Act adopting the present Code was to enact into one statute all the provisions embraced in the Code. Central R. Co. v. State, 104 Ga. 831 [31 SE 531, 42 LRA 518]. And in construing any section of the Code, we must treat it as a single statute forming one homogeneous and consistent body of laws, and each Code section is to be considered in explaining and elucidating every other part of the common system to which it belongs.” Barron v. Terrell, 124 Ga. 1077, 1078 (53 SE 181). The foregoing rule, while applied in that case to the Code of 1895, is a broad…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Price v. HitafferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Huntsinger v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Headman v. RoseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Dawson v. ShaveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eig v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Edwards v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API