Dawson v. Shave
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The Court of Appeals has asked for instruction upon the following question: “A man died intestate, leaving no wife, nor any relatives except one sister, and the children and grandchildren of four deceased sisters and one deceased brother. The living sister was sui juris and qualified to administer on the estate, and so were the children of the intestate’s deceased brother and sisters.. Who was entitled to letters of administration, the person selected in writing by the sister of the intestate, or the person selected in writing by a majority of the children of the *127intestate’s deceased…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wetter v. HabershamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Houston v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Mattox v. EmbrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Ector v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Tanner v. HussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rivers v. AlsupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Rowe v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Sullens v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Walker v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.