Legal Opinion
(PC) Cato v. Darst
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 29, 2021No. 2:17-cv-01873Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES CATO, Case No. 2:17-cv-01873-TLN-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL 13 v. ECF Nos. 57, 60 14 M. DARST, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. THAT THIS ACTION BE VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) 17 ECF No. 62 18 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN 19 DAYS 20 21 22 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action 23 brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Commercial Space Management Company, Inc. v. The Boeing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Richard Zanowick v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Williams v. Peralta Community College Dist.District Court, N.D. California · 2005