Legal Opinion

Burlingham v. City of New Bern

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1914No. 39PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Bill by Charles C. Burlingham and others, trustees of Thomas A. McIntyre and others, bankrupts, against the City of New Bern and others. Heard on the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

The facts agreed upon, material to the decision of the controversy, are; The charter of the city of New Bern, N. C. (chapter 42, Private Laws of 1879), conferred upon said city, among specific powers not affecting the questions presented herein, “the power to do any and all things granted to municipal corporations under any general laws of the state of North Carolina.” The Legislature at its session of 1899 (chapter 30, Private Laws 1899) repealed the charter of said city and, by chapter 82, Private Laws 1899, granted a charter to said city, including the same…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Stanly County v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Wilkes County v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Commissioners of Stanly County v. SnuggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Commissioners of New Hanover County v. DerossetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API