Legal Opinion
Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 23, 1994No. Civ. A. 88-1853PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action, Ruth Haberern (“Plaintiff’) successfully challenged Defendants’ violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). 1 Plaintiff now requests attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $276,-611.30 for services rendered by Drinker, Biddle & Reath (“Drinker”), $38,156.66 for services rendered by Maloney, Danyi, Davis & Danyi (“Maloney”), and $15,242.00 for services rendered by the accounting firm Buckno, Lisicky & Company (“Buckno”). In the alternative, Plaintiff seeks enhanced…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McLaughlin Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. Boston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- HUBER v. SIMON'S AGENCY, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Ben. Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995