Legal Opinion
LouisHarris v. Barall (In Re LouisHarris)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 29, 1997No. 19-20139PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
Roney Louis;Harris, the pro se plaintiff, and a pro se debtor in a Chapter 7 case, filed a complaint on June 24, 1997, requesting the court to find the defendants in contempt of court for violating the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (“the automatic stay”), award damages for such contempt, and order a return of $3,000. The five named defendants are four state-court Family Support Magistrates 1 and one Superior Court Judge of the State of Connecticut. In addition, the plaintiff included as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pitts v. Ohio Department of Taxation (In Re Pitts)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- In Re BurkhardtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Nelson v. La Crosse County District Attorney (In Re Nelson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Peterson v. Florida, Department of Revenue, Office of Child Support Enforcement (In Re Peterson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Metromedia Fiber Network Services, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (In Re Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002