Legal Opinion
Broderick v. Shad
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 20, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 86-1834PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Catherine Broderick, an attorney at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), brings this Title VII sex discrimination and harassment case against the SEC Chairman in his official capacity. She claims the supervising attorneys at the SEC’s now-closed Washington Regional Office (WRO) sexually harassed plaintiff and other female employees, rewarding those who allowed sexual advances and retaliating against those who complained about the hostile work environment. The SEC denies these allegations.
The parties have been engaged in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2782, Edward v. Hanlon, and Ruth A. Sanders Hanlon v. U.S. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Pleasants v. AllbaughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- St. John v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Clarkson v. Alaska Airlines IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.