Legal Opinion

Arthur v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1992No. 90-381PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant Arthur was convicted of assault on Kathleen DeGrace with intent to kill her while armed with a dangerous weapon, namely, a shod foot, 1 and of simple assault 2 on her son, Jeremi DeGrace. On this appeal he challenges only the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction of assault with intent to kill while armed, for which he received a sentence of seven to thirty years in prison. We affirm. 3

I

In August 1989 Kathleen DeGrace was living with three of her five children in Room 377 of the Capital City Inn, which until its recent demolition was leased by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. William D. Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Franey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gathy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Alfaro v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Stroman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API