Legal Opinion

Autozone, Inc. v. Strick

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 7, 2006No. 03 C 8152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HART, District Judge.

Plaintiffs AutoZone, Inc. and AutoZone Parts, Inc. (formerly known as Speedbar, Inc.) 1 have registered the mark AutoZone and some variations including auto-zone.com. and AutoZone & Design. Plaintiffs operate numerous automobile parts retail stores that use the AutoZone mark. In January 2002, plaintiffs were issued a registration for the mark Zone for retail automotive store services. The initial application for the Zone mark was submitted in August 1999. Defendants Michael Strick, Strick, Inc., and Strick Enterprises, Inc. 2 operate a quick…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ty, Inc. v. The Jones Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Ricky Outlaw v. Herb Newkirk and Cameron Mable, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. AutoZone, Inc. v. StrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Hickory Farms, Inc. v. Snackmasters, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Hickory Farms, Inc. v. Snackmasters, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Autozone Inc v. Strick IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API