Legal Opinion

Looney v. City of Wilmington, Del.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 23, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-573-CMWPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

On October 18, 1988, plaintiff Timothy Looney, Jr. brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Wilmington and police officers Donald R. Roberts and Jeffrey DeHart in their individual and official capacities. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. Specifically, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants conducted an illegal search of his building and used excessive force against his person. 1 The plaintiff has…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sornberger v. City Of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Gainor v. Douglas County, GeorgiaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
  3. Sullivant v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Righter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API