Legal Opinion

David Gurski v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 2017No. 332118PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.

*659 In this no-fault priority case, defendant Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) appeals the trial court's order that denied its motion for summary disposition. For the reasons provided below, we reverse and remand for entry of summary disposition in favor of Farm Bureau.

*660 I. NATURE OF THE CASE

This case arises from an accident involving a vehicle and plaintiff. Plaintiff was working outside the vehicle when the vehicle slipped into gear and injured him. Plaintiff thereafter sought the recovery of personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits under Michigan's no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Shay v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Baker v. Arbor Drugs, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Lee v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Teodorico Q Gomez v. Ronel Raad HanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Estate of Teodorico Q Gomez v. Ronel Raad HanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Estate of Terry M Holland v. Mary SpringerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Kenneth Loney v. Steven T SleevaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Nael Haydaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API