Legal Opinion

Kingsley v. Township of Bloomingdale

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Van Burén; Buck, J. Case by Eloyd Kingsley against the township of Bloomingdale for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

In this cause the plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, a township, which was charged with the duty of maintaining a bridge. The plaintiff’s testimony shows that the bridge was 16 feet long, and was made of plank 14 feet long, laid upon stringers, and the bank joined the bridge at an elevation of about 3 feet above the bottom of the ditch which the bridge crossed. He had safely crossed the bridge far enough to bring the back wheels of his carriage 8 feet or more from the bridge, where he stopped several minutes, in conversation with a neighbor. His horse got the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beall v. Township of AthensMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. St. Clair Mineral Springs Co. v. City of St. ClairMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deisenrieter v. Kraus-Merkel Malting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Swain v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Corley v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Doak v. Township of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Irwin v. Township of ByronMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API