Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Township of Byron

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1914No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent; Brown, J. Case by Samuel Irwin against the township of Byron for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the Kent circuit court, for personal injuries which he claims to have incurred in consequence of a defective highway in defendant township. It appears from the record that the plaintiff was the owner of two farms in Byron township. In the highway lying between them was a long, steep hill, known as Whitcomb Hill. Toward evening on the 15th day of April, 1910, plaintiff hitched his horses to a lumber wagon and started for his other farm a mile and a half away, to get several swarms of bees. His daughter and four young people accompanied him. The going part…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beall v. Township of AthensMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bell v. Village of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Doak v. Township of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Kingsley v. Township of BloomingdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Beaumont v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API