Legal Opinion

People v. Hermann

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 26, 1986No. 2-84-0536PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strouse

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting the motions of two criminal defendants for the return of certain properties seized from them, pursuant to search warrants and consent searches. The defendants were convicted of felony theft in the underlying criminal cases based on other property seized at the same time but now returned to the owners.

After pleading guilty to felony theft, defendants filed motions in the trial court seeking the return of their property which had been seized pursuant to search warrants and consent searches and which remains unclaimed by others and is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. CanadayIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Teitelbaum v. Reliable Welding Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. People Ex Rel. Carey v. CovelliIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bee Jay's Truck Stop, Inc. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Finance America Commercial Corp. v. Econo Coach, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. International Amphitheatre Co. v. Vanguard Underwriters InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. People v. ZiomekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Kromeich v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. People v. Four Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty DollarsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API