Legal Opinion

Barker v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 20, 1922No. 71PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

The accused has been convicted of the illegal sale of ardent spirits, sentenced to imprisonment for six months, and fined $500. He assigns and relies on two errors.

1. Before the trial began he moved the court to require the attorney for the Commonwealth to furnish him with a bill of particulars. As the indictment was in the form authorized by section 7 of the prohibition act (Acts 1918, p. 578), he was entitled to know specifically for which of the several • offenses with which he was charged he was to.be prosecuted. Pine & Scott v. Com’th, 121 Va. 812, 93 S. E. 652. In response to this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  2. Clopton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  3. Fletcher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  4. Runde v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  5. Hitt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KoskiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Andrews v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  3. Hudgins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Gimmell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  5. Cooper v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API