Barker v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
The accused has been convicted of the illegal sale of ardent spirits, sentenced to imprisonment for six months, and fined $500. He assigns and relies on two errors.
1. Before the trial began he moved the court to require the attorney for the Commonwealth to furnish him with a bill of particulars. As the indictment was in the form authorized by section 7 of the prohibition act (Acts 1918, p. 578), he was entitled to know specifically for which of the several • offenses with which he was charged he was to.be prosecuted. Pine & Scott v. Com’th, 121 Va. 812, 93 S. E. 652. In response to this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- Clopton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- Fletcher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Runde v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
- Hitt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KoskiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
- Andrews v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Hudgins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Gimmell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Cooper v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.