Legal Opinion

Gimmell v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 23, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

James Gimmell was convicted of violating the pro- ' hibition law and sentenced to confinement in jail for six months and to pay a fine of S150.

The indictment contains two counts. The first charges that the accused “did unlawfully and feloniously manufacture and distill ardent spirits,” and the second is in the blanket form provided by the statute.

The accused assigns as error the action of the court in (1) refusing to grant a continuance; (2) overruling a general demurrer to the indictment; (3) refusing to require the attorney for the Commonwealth to furnish a bill of particulars; (4) giving…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  2. Wallen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  3. Lufty v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Thompson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Andrews v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BeaversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  2. Riner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Sterling Spruill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API